Friday, February 27, 2026
New Listing - 2318 Pamela Lane, Sacramento, CA 95825
Wednesday, February 11, 2026
New Listing - 706 Wagon Trail Way, Rocklin, CA 95765
Thursday, January 22, 2026
Handling a Probate or Trust Estate? Why the homeowners insurance policy is one of the first things you should find...
Both sellers had been named the administrator of a loved one’s Sacramento area probate estate. In both cases, the death of their loved one (the property owner) had occurred more than a year ago and they had delayed filing for probate. And when I asked questions about the property and status of the homeowners insurance policy, both of them admitted that they did not know if there was a homeowners insurance policy for the property. And in each of these cases, the policy coverage had lapsed.
Yikes! That’s a big hairy detail that just CAN NOT be overlooked.
When someone passes away, often grief, family dynamics, and sheer overwhelm take over. Filing for probate is often not top of mind. And it’s emotionally very daunting to sift through your loved one’s finances, documents, and personal property, but I can’t emphasize enough how important it is…and checking for a homeowners insurance policy on any real estate that person owned is one of the most critical boxes to check.
Here’s the reality: if a property is uninsured and something happens like a broken pipe, a break-in, vandalism, a fire, etc…the estate could suffer a massive and catastrophic financial loss. A house or other real property is probably going to be the highest-value financial asset of a probate estate. And if it’s uninsured, and there’s a loss, there is no do-over. There is no retroactive insurance coverage if policy coverage has lapsed.
When someone passes away, the first thing I suggest is look for any and all documentation for existing mortgages and insurance. Contact the insurance agent immediately. You should ask if an existing homeowners policy automatically remains valid after the owner’s death. Some policies may require the insurer to be notified of the death or a change in occupancy status. Vacant homes often need special endorsements or entirely different policies. If the insurance company isn’t informed, a claim could be denied when you need it most.
And if the policy renewal notice comes and goes without being paid, that will likely result in a lapse in coverage. Don’t let that happen.
This is why early in these conversations I try to slow things down and ask very direct questions: Is there an active insurance policy? Who is the carrier? When was the last premium paid? Has the insurance company been notified of the death?
If no one knows the answers, that’s the signal to stop and investigate as soon as possible. Please make one of your first priorities protecting the estate's assets. Making sure there is an active, appropriate homeowners insurance policy in place is one of the simplest steps and one of the most important.
Tuesday, January 6, 2026
Sacramento Landlords: When Holding a Single-Family or Small Multifamily Rental Stops Making Sense
I hear this most often from owners of single-family rental homes, and owners of small multifamily properties like duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes. These guys are not institutional investors. They’re what we refer to commonly as "mom and pop investors" -- meaning regular people who bought with a long-term plan in mind: retirement income, cash flow, or long-term wealth building. And let's face it, for a long time, that plan has worked well.
But heading into 2026, perhaps the calculus has shifted.
- Maybe they talked to their CPA and some of the tax advantages of owning rental investment property have run their course. Depreciation is usually part of this conversation. Many long-term rental owners are nearing full depreciation, meaning the tax advantages that once made ownership especially appealing are starting to fade. When those benefits diminish, it often prompts a closer look at whether continuing to hold still makes sense.
- Maybe they are considering retiring and riding off into the sunset in their RV and owning rental property in Sacramento is not something they want the responsibility for. Some landlords begin to wonder whether keeping that equity locked inside a rental property is still the best use of their capital. For landlords approaching retirement there is often a shifting desire for liquidity and simplicity. Selling a rental property can provide funds to support retirement, reduce risk, and eliminate the day-to-day responsibilities that come with being a landlord.
- Maybe they already live outside of the area and coordinating repairs and keeping up with tenant issues from a distance is too much to manage. Absentee owners, in particular, may decide it’s time to cash in, simplify their lives, and redeploy the proceeds toward other investments, lifestyle goals, or greater financial flexibility.
- Maybe a tenant has stopped paying rent and they are faced with an expensive eviction, and just do not want to deal anymore. Or perhaps a tenant has provided notice to vacate, and it proves to be an opportune time to sell rather than re-rent the property.
- Maybe they want to help their adult kids buy their first home, and selling the old rental property is the perfect vehicle for a tax deferred 1031 Exchange. A lot of my clients are considering how to help their adult kids become homeowners and maybe give them the inheritance a little early.
- Maybe expenses like insurance premiums are increasing, or there are some anticipated large repair expenses looming due to some deferred maintenance. A new roof, a new HVAC, a new sewer line, dryrot or termites...these can be big ticket items if a housing provider does not have liquid reserves set aside.
- Maybe they aren't excited with the direction the California legislature is going with tenant protections and the ever-evolving regulatory landscape, and they are over it. In the last few years, California has enacted AB1482 rent caps and just cause eviction, has limited the amount a landlord can charge as a rental deposit, and has now required landlords to provide refrigerators and stoves as a condition of habitability.
- Maybe they never intended to be a landlord in the first place! They inherited the property, or maybe couldn't get the price they wanted when they moved out of the property and decided to rent it out.
Monday, December 29, 2025
What California AB723 means for Sacramento home buyers and sellers...
On all of my listings I hire an awesome professional photographer who does an stellar job at capturing the perfect angle, balancing light, and softening the rough edges of homes...but some agents and photographers take things a few steps too far and use AI or other tools to virtually add features a home just does not have, or photoshop out those fugly power lines running through the backyard, or virtually remodel a home.
I have walked into homes with clients before and been like "Huh, I thought this kitchen was remodeled?"
Enter California AB723, a new law going into effect next week that is designed to bring and fewer surprises to real estate marketing photos. Starting January 1, 2026, real estate listings in California will be required to clearly disclose when images have been digitally altered in ways that materially change the features of the property. In plain English: if a photo has been edited to add furniture, change landscaping, remove unsightly neighboring properties, repaint walls, or otherwise make the property look meaningfully different than it is in real life, the listing must say so. And the listing must make this original image available.
Now, don’t worry: this doesn’t mean listings have to look boring or unpolished. Basic touch-ups like adjusting lighting, color balance, optimizing the way a room looks with a wide angle lens, or cropping a photo are still perfectly fine. AB723 focuses on changes that could impact how a buyer perceives or understands the actual condition or features of the home.So as an example from one of my own listings -- last year I wanted to illustrate that the backyard of an Arden-Arcade home I listed was potentially big enough to build an Accessory Dwelling Unit. So I hired someone to add a rendering of an ADU to one of the aerial drone images my professional photographer took. And they also happened to edit the grass to be more green (which I did not ask them to do but it sure made the photo look better!). I did add a disclaimer to the photo and include the original in the listing, however now in the future I would also want to add a disclosure to the image specifically noting it was digital altered. For what it is worth, I also added some virtual staging furniture to two rooms, and did disclose the images were altered and provided the originals, as you can see in the archived listing online. Was I required to by law at that time? No. But I have always felt transparency is better. And now everyone in California will have to disclose digital alterations.
For home buyers, this is a win. You’ll have clearer expectations before you ever step foot inside a home. If a listing photo has been digitally altered, you’ll know it, and you’ll also have access to the original, unaltered images. Fewer surprises means better decision-making, less frustration, and hopefully fewer “Wait… where did that go?” moments during showings.
For home sellers, this law encourages transparency without taking away great marketing. Virtual staging and enhanced photos can still be used -- they just need to be clearly labeled. Trust me seller, you want to avoid buyer disappointment when they walk in the door. That can leave a bad taste in a buyer's mouth...you want a buyer to connect with your home, not be frustrated by a big letdown or upset expectations.
Real estate is already emotional enough for buyers without feeling catfished by a listing photo. This new law will help keep expectations realistic.






